Generative AI Policy

Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) and AI-assisted technologies ("AI tools") are increasingly being adopted in research and scholarly publishing. These technologies can assist researchers throughout the research and manuscript preparation process by improving efficiency, enhancing language quality, organizing content, supporting coding activities, generating visualizations, and facilitating literature exploration. At the same time, their use requires clear standards to ensure transparency, research integrity, accountability, and responsible scholarly communication.

COREAI: Jurnal Kecerdasan Buatan, Komputasi dan Teknologi Informasi supports the responsible use of AI tools while recognizing that human expertise, scientific judgment, and ethical responsibility must always remain central to the research and publication process.

These policies provide guidance for authors, reviewers, and editors regarding the acceptable use of Generative AI. COREAI will periodically review and update these policies as AI technologies, publishing practices, and international standards continue to evolve.

Guidelines for Authors

Jurnal keperawatan profesional permits the use of generative artificial intelligence tools and AI-assisted technologies, provided that such tools are used responsibly and remain under human supervision. Authors must verify the accuracy, completeness, and potential biases of any AI-generated output, including automatically generated references.

Any use of AI tools must be clearly disclosed through a Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies, specifying the name of the tool, its purpose, and the extent of human review or editing. This declaration should appear in the manuscript before the reference section.

Generative AI tools may not replace the author’s critical reasoning, analytical work, interpretation, or original intellectual contribution. Full responsibility for the content rests with the human author(s), and AI tools must not be credited as authors or co-authors.

The use of AI to create or modify images or illustrations is permissible only when it does not alter the underlying scientific information. If AI forms part of the research methodology, a clear description must be provided in the Methods section.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies

Example:

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author(s) used ChatGPT (OpenAI) to check grammar and enhance language clarity. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as required and assume full responsibility for the published material.

Note: Basic spelling, grammar, or punctuation corrections performed by standard writing software do not require disclosure. Where AI tools are used as part of the research methodology, their use must be fully described in the Methods section to ensure transparency and reproducibility.

Guidelines for Reviewers

Reviewers must uphold strict confidentiality for all manuscripts assigned for peer review. They are prohibited from uploading any portion of a manuscript to external generative AI platforms or third-party AI systems, as doing so may violate confidentiality obligations and infringe upon the authors’ copyrights.

Reviewers may not use AI tools to draft or edit their review reports if the process requires uploading confidential manuscript content. Furthermore, AI tools must not be used to assess scientific merit, methodology, or the scholarly contribution of a manuscript. Reviewers remain fully accountable for the integrity, accuracy, and professionalism of their evaluations.

Guidelines for Editors

Editors are responsible for safeguarding the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and must not upload manuscripts, editorial decisions, or any confidential material to external generative AI systems. Scientific assessments and editorial decisions must be made exclusively by human editors and members of the editorial board, not by AI systems.

AI tools may be utilized for limited administrative or technical purposes—such as formatting checks, plagiarism detection, data integrity screening, or reviewer recommendation—provided that these activities remain under human oversight. The final editorial decision and publication responsibility rest solely with the human editors.